The White Gold Rush: Greenland Today, Antarctica Tomorrow

The map of the world is being redrawn, but not by cartographers. It is being redrawn by heat, greed, and a sudden, sharp amnesia regarding the “Global Commons.”

As we sit in the early weeks of 2026, the diplomatic “hue and cry” over Greenland has reached a fever pitch. What was once dismissed as a fringe geopolitical curiosity—the “buying” of the world’s largest island—has transformed into a clinical, bilateral scramble for rare earth elements and strategic ice. But for those of us in the Global South, this isn’t just about the North Atlantic. It is a terrifying blueprint for a new era of colonial ecology.

The Icelandic Warning: A Fragile Balance

To understand the danger, we must look at our recent history. Do you remember the relentless volcanic eruptions in Iceland’s Reykjanes Peninsula throughout 2024 and 2025? We watched as fissures tore through the earth, but the true alarm wasn’t just the lava—it was the record-breaking May 2025 heatwave that followed.

In a region where the ecosystem is balanced on a knife-edge of temperature, the combination of geothermal upheaval and human-induced warming created an ecological “double-tap.” When temperatures in Iceland and Eastern Greenland spiked 13°C above average last year, it wasn’t just a weather event; it was a demonstration of how quickly “permanent” landscapes can destabilize.

If a single volcanic chain can disrupt the climate of a region so thoroughly, what happens when we introduce industrial-scale mining, shipping lanes, and military outposts?

The “Scramble” Logic: From Ice to Space

The logic being applied to Greenland today—that resource scarcity justifies the occupation of sensitive zones—is a virus. If the international community accepts that Greenland is “up for grabs” because its ice is melting, what stops the same logic from being applied to Antarctica tomorrow?

We are already seeing the “cracks” in the Antarctic Treaty. In the last year, “scientific” bases have proliferated along the Antarctic Peninsula, often serving as thinly veiled placeholders for future territorial claims. The 2048 moratorium on Antarctic mining feels less like a shield and more like a countdown.

This culture of “occupy and exploit” doesn’t stop at our poles. If we normalize the desecration of the Earth’s most sensitive “refrigerators” for material gain, the Moon is next. We are teaching the next generation that there is no such thing as a “protected region”—only a region that hasn’t been priced yet.

The Great Hypocrisy: A View from the South

As the Global South authority, we must call out the staggering double standard at play.

• We are told to stop Brazil from managing the Amazon because it is the “lungs of the planet.”
• We are told the Peat-lands of Africa and Southeast Asia must remain untouched as “carbon bombs.”
• We are sanctioned and lectured on rhino and elephant poaching to preserve the world’s “natural heritage.”

Yet, the same voices demanding conservation in the South are the ones currently bidding on the minerals beneath the Greenlandic ice sheet. Why is a forest in the Congo a “global heritage,” but the Arctic is a “national resource”?

If the North continues this trend, we are witnessing the total decentralization of Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). We are moving back to a world where “The Environment” is no longer a shared trans-boundary responsibility, but a national asset to be traded or destroyed for profit.

What Are We Giving Our Children?

The planet Earth exists in its current state because our elders—flawed as they were—understood the value of collaboration over standing against each other. They built the Paris Agreement and the Antarctic Treaty not out of saintliness, but out of the cold realization that trans-boundary problems require trans-boundary solutions.

Today’s materialistic rush ignores this wisdom. We are trading the very climate stability that allows our children to breathe for a few decades of battery minerals and “strategic positioning.”

If we don’t stop the scramble for Greenland now, we aren’t just losing an island. We are losing the idea that anything on this planet belongs to the future.

---

Is the “Rules-Based Order” only for the South? Let’s discuss in the comments.

This post is part of our series on the “New Colonialism” of the 2020s. Subscribe to stay informed on the Global South’s perspective on the world’s most pressing frontiers.